Is the Solar Glass Half Full or Half Empty?

Is the solar glass half full or half empty? The answer depends on whether you’re a manufacturer or consumer.

I’ve followed First Solar business ventures ever since the company had its IPO in 2006. I like the cadmium telluride thin film technology, probably because of its deviation from boring old silicon. I even held a few shares of First Solar, which I dumped when profits and share prices started falling across the industry.

So it was with some sadness I read about First Solar’s Dec. 14, 2011 conference call with analysts. Projected earnings are down by about 25 percent for 2011 and about 75 percent from the Wall Street consensus for 2012. That’s quite a tumble!

Then First Solar CEO Michael Ahearn made the surprising statement that First Solar was “shifting our revenue base from subsidized to sustainable markets, starting in 2012. It won’t happen overnight and we’ll have to transition out of the subsidies we currently depend on, but our goal is to shift progressively over the 2012 to 2014 timeframe so that by Q4 2014, we derive virtually all of our new revenues from sustainable markets.”

That means that First Solar is withdrawing from the subsidized panel business and focusing on utility scale applications. To compete in non-subsidized markets First Solar will need to drop its production costs by 30 percent.

So forget about much production or job creation in the U.S.

But First Solar plans indicate a conclusion being reached by many of the other 300 or so solar manufacturers around the globe. Consumer scale solar panels are now a commodity, driven by economies of production, cheap labor and materials.

Bad news for manufacturers but good news for consumers looking for a fire sale. Bad news for those expecting subsidies to create American jobs. Good news for folks rooting for increased deployment of renewable energy.

See also: Battlefield Solar: Are We Seeing a Partial Collapse of the Global PV Industry?

Comments

Totally Full

The solar glass is totally full of other people's money. Evidently paying 2X, 3X, or more of the price of regular energy for solar is seen as a stupid move by some. And with Climategate II pulling the rug out from under that little bit of legerdemain the prospects for very high cost "green" energy is looking black.

But if you could get the process in the black without subsidies there would be a LOT more $green available.

Come to think of it the whole solar/wind/green charade is looking a lot like crony capitalism. With subsidy dollars recycled to the politicians who keep it going.

Its just a tool

Why do we keep looking at solar as a cure all. Like tools, they are good for certain applications. Solar is great for remote sites with no utilities. This is where ROI means nothing. Its like taking a shovel and using it to build an entire building. Just use it to dig holes.

I love the lower prices by the way. I just bought 400 watts of panels, charge controllers, inverter, and batteries for around $2,000. Two years ago it would have cost around $4,000.